<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>UMPC.COM : Insiders guide to ultra mobile personal computing !</title>
	<link>http://www.umpc.com</link>
	<description>The insiders Guide to Mobile Personal Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:48:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.0.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>So where is Intel &#8220;UMPC&#8221; team headed ?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumor has it that head of Intel UMG ( ultra Mobile Group) Intel VP Anand Chandrasekher is betting his career on Intel hardware based Smart-phones.  All our Intel ex-colleagues seems to be flying to Finland a lot. Nokia is there big bet.  But then Nokia needs a miracle to survive iPhone, Android and Blackberry Juggernaut.  Although we think Nokia still makes the best phones ( sorry iPhone fans) but Android is the best Phone OS. You would think Nokia will swallow ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.umpc.com/general/so-where-is-intel-umpc-team-headed</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Apple direction with hardware in iPAD and iPhone space</title>
		<description><![CDATA[So where is apple going with iPAD and iPhone hardware ?  Intrinsity is the key name to remember here. The acquisition of P.A. Semi (a California chip design start up) was first indication that Apple not happy with current chip offering and wants to do its own chips. Since it early PowerMacs day, Apple is used to influencing the chip hardware directly. Motorola and to some extent IBM were much more willing to be cooperate with Apple on this. Intel ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.umpc.com/general/apple-direction-with-hardware-in-ipad-and-iphone-space</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Is ipad a UMPC ?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Let see if we can rationally answer the question, is iPAD a UMPC (Ultra Mobile Personal computer) ? What does Intel or Microsoft think and what is our UMPC.com&#8217;s official position, read on. If we ask Intel answer will be most likely no.  Why ? because Intel defined UMPC as having x86 (official term from Intel is IA &#8211; Intel architecture) processor and chipset Lets try asking Microsoft( Or Origami folks). Most likely answer here will be no as well ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.umpc.com/general/is-ipad-a-umpc</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>UMPC to Netbook the inside story</title>
		<description><![CDATA[While the UMPC category is evolving and changing, it is definitely here to stay. One question we hear often is: what were MS and Intel really thinking when promoting the UMPC concept? And how did the Netbook product category get started? There is a lot more to it than the ASUS EEPC. Read on. In 2005-2006, Intel and MS started pushing a new product category called UMPC. The Intel and MS UMPC teams who created this concept insisted on machines ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.umpc.com/general/the-insiders-guide-to-mobile-computing</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>How can Intel continue to grow?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[For Intel to continue its revenue growth, they must expand into the consumer electronics/communications market and sell UMPC/MID platforms. Like most large companies, Intel’s method of gaining market share relies on trying to get large customers to adopt their vision. Although there is probably no better customer than Apple for the mobile devices space, we do not think Intel is getting anywhere with Apple in that regard. We believe this is because Apple takes a user-centric approach to product design, ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.umpc.com/general/how-can-intel-continue-to-grow</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Designer’s Guide</title>
		<description><![CDATA[General Guidelines Here are some general guidelines learned from our experience architecting some of the early UMPC products in the market. How the device will be used needs to be defined before choosing platform. Starting the process by negotiating with hardware and software vendors to use their platform is a backwards approach to design. What matters most at this stage is how the device will be used! Designs which do not look beyond gadget enthusiast are only good as a ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.umpc.com/designers-guide/designers-guide</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Latest Trends</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPhone has made touch interface popular, and many other new devices will release soon with a tablet form-factor, but a pocketable size. The UMPCs that are evolving toward such a form-factor/size are known as Mobile Internet Devices (MID). Many MID devices will launch in Summer/Fall of 2008, although few of those devices will be pocketable. The subsequent generation will have many pocketable options. The sub-notebook of yesterday is the UMPC clamshell of today and will exist as a cheap ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.umpc.com/trends/latest-trends</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

